These provisions use to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, whether or not the transaction occurred just before its promulgation. Read more

For legal professionals, there are specific rules regarding case citation, which range depending about the court and jurisdiction hearing the case. Proper case law citation in the state court might not be suitable, or maybe accepted, with the U.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the learned counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard for the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession of your subjected premises on the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs for being decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this factor for interim custody of the topic premises Should the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.

This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based around the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above facts and circumstances in the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more

This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding achieved with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your summary or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or perhaps the finding and mildew the relief to make it proper for the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority may be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or even the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified through the decision in the Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more

These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Enable the decision stand"—could be the principle by which judges are bound to this sort of past decisions, drawing on founded judicial authority to formulate their positions.

The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were advised on the boy’s past, they questioned if their children were Harmless with him in their home. The therapist assured them that they had almost nothing to fret about.

The law as founded in previous court rulings; like common legislation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.

163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be very well-settled that when contemplating the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority needs to evaluate the benefit of all the qualified candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these types of qualified candidates who will be found for being most meritorious amongst them. Considering that the petitioner was held to be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was ignored because of the respondent department just to extend favor to your blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy within the part in the respondent department.

The regulation of necessity acknowledged and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called legislation of necessity..

12 . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair on the offender plus the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court together with from other courts Nonetheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.

These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and consist of all notable cases decided from the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.

171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be very well founded now that the provision for proforma promotion isn't alien or unfamiliar for the civil servant service construction however it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it really is lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may well if satisfied that a civil servant who was entitled for being promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his have, wrongfully prevented from rendering service to the Federation/ province within the higher post, direct that these kinds of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay and allowances of these kinds of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, It's also a effectively-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work read more as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.